I have often heard those who were in law enforcement say
over and over that if Bigfoot had committed a crime there would be overwhelming
evidence to convict. I often wonder short of a body or live specimen what it
would take for the “skeptics” to acknowledge the existence of Bigfoot? Each
year the mountain of evidence grows and we all are impatiently awaiting the
publishing of the DNA study.
I have gained some recognition in the “Bigfoot Community”
over the last couple years. Some good and some bad but this had lead to me
receiving report after report of Bigfoot sightings. People hear my name
mentioned, watch my videos on YouTube, or see my affiliation with NABS (North
American Bigfoot Search) and they contact me with their sighting reports. It is
amazing how many sightings of Bigfoot there are in just one year. The
backgrounds vary from those with doctorate degrees to housewives. It truly is
amazing when you look at the “big picture” of what is really going on.
So when I see critics and skeptics blast eyewitnesses and
researchers I scratch my head wonder why? Many of the critics/skeptics are just
“bomb throwers” who are ignorant of the subject completely. Some
critics/skeptics are well educated, professionals in some related field of
biology, wildlife studies, etc. Their stance is more difficult to comprehend
given their backgrounds. Many times the resistance is institutional; more based
on what is accepted science and what subject matters are frowned upon. Bigfoot
currently is one of the subjects frowned upon by mainstream science and the
related institutions. There has been a crack in this wall lately, but currently
the party line is “we will accept the possibility of a bi-pedal ape, but not a
possible humanoid.”
The bottom line is what will it take? How much is enough?
The evidence:
Footprint found at my home |
Footprints: Dr. Jeff Meldrum has collected hundreds
of footprint cast. These cast show variation, toe spray, and dermal ridges. The
variation in size form a “Bell Curve” when charted to show there is a breeding
population consisting of children and adults. I have documented and collected
many prints. So many in fact it’s become commonplace to find them.
Hand print left on the siding of my house |
Fingerprints: I have found and documented large
fingerprints and hand prints on more than one occasion. Others researchers have
also fount fingerprints, hand prints in the mud, or even on trail cameras. Jimmy
Chilcutt, a well-respected forensic examiner from Texas, has been on the record
for many years now about his belief in Bigfoot because of the dermal ridges
found in both the cast of footprints and hand prints.
Finger prints found on dog food container |
Sketch of Bigfoot I witnessed in 2010 |
Eye Witness Reports: David Paulides had national
renowned forensic artist Harvey Pratt sketch eye witness descriptions of the
Bigfoot in both his books The Hoopa Project and Tribal Bigfoot. David would not
publish a report or forensic sketch unless the eyewitness signed an affidavit
affirming the report was true and accurate.
The BFRO alone has posted over 2,100 reports in the modern era and takes
over 500 new reports each year.
Still captures from the "Freeman Footage" |
Video Footage: The Patterson/Gimlin film is still the
gold standard, but videos continue to come in from all over the country.
Hundreds of videos are posted on YouTube each year claiming to show Bigfoot.
The majority of these are unconvincing, but each year a few are posted that
leaves you wondering. It is only a
matter of time before a vacationer captures the video we have all been waiting
for.
The "Blot Watcher" Bigfoot |
Audio Recordings: Retired Navy linguist and professor
Scott Nelson has identified a language being spoken on recordings made in the
wilderness. The main audio is from what is known as the “Sierra Sounds” but I
have also sent him audio I recorded in 2011 that he identified as Bigfoot and
transcribed. Scott continues to get bombarded with scores of recordings each
year.
Hair I collected that was submitted to the DNA Study |
DNA: Melba Ketchum is in the process of publishing a
“peer reviewed” paper in a major scientific journal. This DNA paper reportedly
will prove the species exist using nuclear DNA results from hair, blood, and
tissue samples collected from around the country and the world. I am privileged
to be a participant in this study with hair samples I have submitted. (Sources: http://www.nabigfootsearch.com/bigfoot_dna.html,
Robert Lindsay, Bigfoot Evidence Blog)
The “Cover Up”
There is one group of agencies and professionals that
actually know the Bigfoot exist but do their best to keep this information
under wraps. I think the motivation to keep the existence of a free roaming
bipedal humanoid hidden from the public centers around money, mainly the fear
of the loss of revenue to the communities that benefit from the State and
Federal Parks.
A prime example is The Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
This park generates over 700 million dollars in revenue per year for the communities
surrounding its borders. (Source: http://www.nps.gov/grsm/parkmgmt/statistics.htm).
Also, over 14,000 people are employed in these communities
because of the park.
If the existence of Bigfoot became common knowledge and the
fear caused just a 10% drop in visitation to the park the affect would be
devastating to the local economies.
(Calibrating Sources: http://jevningresearch.blogspot.com/,
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2012/04/government-and-logging-industry-denying.html, http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/possible-government-conspiracy-to-cover-up-bigfoots-existence/
)
The real question in my mind is how much longer can this
secret be kept under wraps? Eventually
the DNA Study will be released, a body found, or a video recorded that will get
into the public domain.
Scott, it is my opinion the old saying of "Follow the Money" holds some merit here. You
ReplyDeletebring forth a valid agruement about the people that would be affected by an acknowledgement by the feds of bigfoot. Just as David Paulides's books Missing 411 brought forth the feds refusal
to form a database to allow law-enforcement to
cross reference missing persons with-in the national parks, I feel it's all about the money
that could be lost. The people be damned.
What's wrong with this picture?
I suspect it's also about logging too.
ReplyDeleteBlondie