the Bigfoot in North America a descendant of or related to the “extinct” civilization
of the humanoids that had elongated skulls?
One of the evidences of that support this theory are the thousands of elongated
skulls found both in North and South America. Paracas is the most famous
location and a Google search entitled “paracas skulls” will yield thousands of
results and hundreds of pictures.
some of these anomalous skulls were created by a process known as “head
boarding” many of the skulls are the result of the DNA phenotype being
expressed and not artificially created. The on-line magazine “Ancient Origins” published
an article on February, 5th, 2014 called “Initial DNA analysis of
Paracas elongated skull released – with incredible results” by April Holloway. In this article the size and volume of the
skulls are documented:
well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial
deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is
intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is
usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in
cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it
does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of
a regular human skull.
skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent
larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they
could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They
also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the
skulls’ features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause
of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades.
Foerster had these skulls DNA tested and the preliminary results are as follows:
It had mtDNA
(mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal
known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample
indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like
creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.
results are similar to the results of Sasquatch Genome Study and some of the
Bigfoot I have captured on video have heads with similar shapes to these
Below is the conclusion of the Sasquatch Genome Project:
The data clearly supports that
these hominins exist as a novel species of primate. The data further suggests
that they are human hybrids originating from human females. This hybridization
can be likened to humans with Denisovan admixture resulting from Denisovan
males mating with human females103. The same type of mating potentially
occurred with Sasquatch; however, in the case of Sasquatch, the admixture is
human. Though preliminary analysis supports the hybridization hypothesis,
alternatively, it could also be hypothesized that the Sasquatch are human in
origin, having been isolated in closed breeding populations for thousands of
years. Nevertheless, the data
conclusively proves that the Sasquatch exist as an extant hominin and are a
direct maternal descendent of modern humans.
Could the creature we know as "Bigfoot" be a hybrid between this race of creatures with elongated skulls and human women?
Not all Bigfoot have
these elongated or “cone shaped” heads but many do, especially the Bigfoot in
the Western United States.
following photographs compare two of my Bigfoot still captures to the elongated
Another physical feature that are
similar between some Bigfoot and the elongated skull is a protrusion on the
forehead, This protrusion or ridge is located somewhere above the brow. I first
became aware of this physical feature when Mary Green first clued me in a few
years ago. We were discussing the physical attributes of the Bigfoot that she
wrote about in the book “50 Years With Bigfoot: Tennessee Chronicles of
Co-Existence”. She said to me “you know they have a ridge on their skull above
the brow ridge?”. I told her I had no idea. She replied “Yes, Janice (Carter)
told me that all the Bigfoot she interacted with had a ridge or protruding
bulge above the brow ridge. It is hard to see because of the thick hair, but
can been seen when you are up close”.
It was not long after this
conversation that I discovered when reviewing my still captures a Bigfoot that
had this “bump” or “ridge” above the brown ridge. Below is a cutout still
capture compared to several elongated skulls.
Below is a sketch of the “Gray Ghost” Bigfoot
Compared to a elongated skull.
Though I cannot conclusively say
there is direct relationship, the visual and similar DNA evidence point to a
possible link between the two. Hopefully in the future as both Brien Forester
and Melba Ketchum continue their projects the DNA can be compared to see if the
two species are related. If so it will go a long way in explaining the origin
of the Bigfoot.