"Infant Bigfoot" on left compared to a squirrel on right |
In 2009 I captured a black and white video of what I
maintain is a infant Bigfoot. I did exhaustive follow-up on the video. I had
the angles and measurements so using some good old-fashioned algebra I was able
to accurately determine the size of the subject’s head and the body height. To
this day the video still gets hits and is still controversial. The interesting
aspect of the video is the diverse range of comments I receive. Almost everyone
sees something different. There is no argument something is there, but what is
there is the subject of debate.
I of course see an infant Bigfoot, but others claim to see a
diverse range of animals and that is the interesting aspect. I have received
comments from people who claim to be “Life Long Hunters”, “Expert Woodsmen”,
“Wild Life Biologist”, “Forensic
Experts”, “spent all my time in the woods”, “Raccoon Hunters”, and of course
“Bigfoot Experts”. Most will guess an animal they are familiar with while
others seem to just pull something out of the hat and toss it out there, but
many of the commenters claim it can not be a Bigfoot because “that is not what
they look like”, “everyone knows they don’t exist”, or my favorite one “I do
not know what a Bigfoot looks like, but I know that is not it!”.
Even though I have demonstrated the head of the subject to
be at least eight inches across commenter after commenter will claim it’s a
small rodent which head never grows bigger than two inches.
It appears that people are going to form their opinions
regardless of the facts. As the old saying goes, “don’t tell me the facts, that
will get in the way of my opinion”. I have found that most people bring their
predisposed biases with them and look at everything through that filter. What I
see as a Bigfoot others see known animals or if it cannot be explained as a
known animal then it must be a hoax.
The below collage compares a still capture from the game camera footage that I contend is an Infant Bigfoot to a variety of animals commenters have claimed the subject to be. (The monkey comparison is the only plausible explanation that I can see other than a Bigfoot. I contacted animal control in that county and no pet monkeys were reported missing at that time and there were no reports of people seeing a monkey.)
I often wonder what it will take in a video to satisfy
people? The debate still rages over the P&G film. In this age of CGI no one
trust the images or videos that are posted. In the end we all see what we want
to see. I see Bigfoot you see squirrels. The only way to truly satisfy most of
the people is to present a complete body of information, clear video and DNA.
Yet there are still some that will not be satisfied until a live or dead
specimen is produced.
I cannot complain too loudly because I am guilty from time
to time of not seeing what other people see. On many occasions I am sent videos
and pictures that the owners claim show a Bigfoot. I will look at them and will
not see anything even remotely looking like a Bigfoot. I will be honest and
tell them I do not see anything to which they reply “It is plain as day! Its
right here!!, I can’t believe you of all people can’t see that!!!”. So I try
not to get frustrated when others only see shadows, limbs, and leafs blowing
in the wind.
Until the body shows up or the DNA study is published we
will continue rolling around in the muck of debate, controversy, and derision.
I hope one day the issue will be settled but for now I’ll keep posting my
videos of the giant four foot squirrels with eight inch heads.
Post by: Scott Carpenter
Scott, it,s your call. You call it what you want. And I"ll back you up. In any case, so much
ReplyDeletefor "You Must Have Been A Beautiful Baby".