Wednesday, November 19, 2014

The Gray Entity

During a Bigfoot encounter in July of 2013, where I was surrounded by Bigfoot snapping limbs and stomping the ground, I captured footage of strange gray entity with large almond shaped black eyes. Is this a "ET" or something else? Is it with the Bigfoot? Is it the reason for all the activity around me?

More questions than answers. I have captured these gray entities more than once during my research. They seem to show up when I least expect it and always uninvited.  One small one was clinging to the side of the Dogman that I captured on video. Another showed up on a game camera at a feeding station.

There have been reports of UFO sightings around ares where Bigfoot encounters have occurred. In some cases the Bigfoot were reported to be on or around UFOs. Both communities are reluctant to discuss the link. But my own experiences and this video help lend credibility to these reports and the possible link in these two phenomenon. Yes Bigfoot and UFOs, very strange bed fellows.

Friday, November 14, 2014

Orang Pendek study Corroborates Sasquatch Genome Study

A recent study of Orang Pendek hair yields results remarkably similar to Dr. Ketchum's Sasquatch Genome Study results. Dr. Tom Gilbert's results were human for mtDNA but the hair expert claims the hairs are not human. Then goes on to suggest the Dr. Gilbert, who has published over 100 papers, and is an "expert" in his field contaminated the samples! There are none so blind than those who refuse to see.

Dr. Ketchum releases video explaining there was NO CONTAMINATION of the Sasquatch Samples

Dr. Ketchum has released a very good and very detailed video on how the DNA samples were processed to avoid any contamination.This is in depth and detailed answering the questions that the reviewers did not want to know.

Monday, October 27, 2014

"Main Stream" Study Published in the Journal Nature Supports The Findings of the Sasquatch Genome Project

The participants in and the supporters of the Sasquatch Genome Project received an eye opening education about the politics of modern science. We also received a crash course in publishing scientific papers and the bias that exist in the current scientific establishment hierarchy. We all were convinced that the mountain of evidence presented in the DNA study would be more than enough to persuade the stubborn naysayers in the scientific community. We all learned a hard lesson and George Knapp tried to warn us. But now it appears that even though the negative bias still exist toward the study, new evidence is coming forth to support the DNA Study from a extremely unlikely source.

A study published in the Journal Nature appears to support the general findings of the DNA study. One of the main criticism of the Sasquatch DNA Paper published in early 2013 was that hybridization between Sasquatch and modern humans was "ludicrous", "impossible", or "wild speculation". But wait, fast forward to December of 2013 and a group of scientist publish a paper in the Journal Nature that essentially claims that the genome of a Neanderthal skeleton they discovered was actually a hybrid. A mixture of modern humans, denisovans, neanderthals, and (surprise-surpise) a "potential unknown hominin".

"The new analysis finds that the genomes of Han Chinese and other mainland Asian populations, as well as of Native Americans, contain about 0.2 percent Denisovan genes.

The genome comparisons also show that Denisovans interbred with a mysterious, fourth group of early humans also living in Eurasia at the time."


The results are extremely similar to Dr. Ketchum's results, a genome that shows hybridization with modern humans and a unknown hominin. It is more than worth mentioning that the Journal Nature treated the DNA Study and the DNA Study Team extremely unprofessionally. Journal Nature reviewers violated ethic rules by releasing the peer reviews of  the DNA Study paper to third parties. These third parties then used this information along with the confidentiality agreement imposed the the Sasquatch Genome Project members to wage a disinformation/smear campaign. The Journal Nature also employed delaying tactics keeping the paper in the review process for two years. The Journal Nature demanded frivolous documentation and some reviewers refused to read the paper rejecting it without even bothering to read it. The reviewers that read the paper ask for documentation that already existed in the paper, and some of the reviewers just refused to believe the results even though there was detailed documentation to include three complete genomes. (Peer Reviews) Then the Journal Nature finally rejected the paper for publication after years of delaying tactics and two peer review processes.

 In comparison the Neanderthal Genome paper referenced above was received by Journal Nature on

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Blinking Bigfoot on Trail Camera?

This trail camera footage was captured at the National Park close to where I captured the Plot Watcher footage.

Monday, October 20, 2014

Bigfoot sneaking a peak?

While walking quickly through very heavy vegetation I have my camera pointed to the side. During review I notice I walk by something very dark crouched beside the trail. I never noticed the subject so I only captured a second or two of this dark object. One frame looks extremely interesting. Is it a Bigfoot? The area of this video capture has heavy Bigfoot activity.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Anomalies at the Feeding Station

While videoing at a feeding station I capture two oddities. Are these anomalies nothing more than shadows and leafs or something else? One of the subjects appears to move and even though I zoom in and out  change the camera angle the anomalies maintain their integrity.