I have a interesting theory about how the Bigfoot hide from us or at times seem to disappear. During my research I have noticed a phenomenon that I
occasionally will capture on video recordings. I will usually get the gut
“feeling” I am being watched. I then stop and take video of the area where I
think the Bigfoot is concealed. I will
pause and video for a minute or two and sometimes zoom in and out of the area
then move on. When I review the video at a later date I will notice a “blurry”
area in the video. The foliage in front of and behind this “blurry” area will be
in crisp focus. In a small number of these “blurry” areas a faint figure can
sometimes be seen. The figure is always out of focus but recognizable features
can sometimes be seen in the “blurry” area such as a nose, mouth, eyes, arms,
shoulder, and upper trunk. I have checked my video camera and it is functioning
correctly. The lens is clear of debris or finger smudges. The “blurry” area is
in different locations on the frame, left, right, and middle. I am not seeing this “blurry” effect with the
naked eye while I am in the field. I only seem to capture it on the video
camera.
I
began to do research on what could be causing this or what it could be. I found
many eye witness accounts where the person reports seeing a Bigfoot then it just “disappears into thin air”. Other
witnesses have reported seeing a figure that resembles the alien in the
“Predator” movies when using the artificial “cloak”. Native Americans have long
believed the Bigfoot has supernatural powers to become invisible or shape shift
into other animals. The Native Americans believe this explains how when
seemingly cornered with no route of escape the Bigfoot can just disappear from
sight.
Theory:
The Bigfoot has the ability to use
acoustics (infrasound) to excite and control the water vapor molecules in the
air around them. They use the water vapor as a prism to reflect and diffuse the
light away from their bodies creating a cloaking affect. The Bigfoot will
appear to blend in with the environment around them to create a natural
camouflage. This camouflage effect is created because the eye is seeing the
objects that are around the Bigfoot at different angles.
Date: June 5th,
2010
Location: Research Area
B, National Park
I
capture just a few frames of a Bigfoot hiding in the middle of heavy vegetation. It
is only approximately one hundred feet from the parking area of the trail head.
I had the feeling I was being watched and should have stopped and filmed the
area thoroughly. Unfortunately I was in a hurry to get to other areas so I
pointed the camera in the direction I thought the Bigfoot was
hiding and filmed as I walked. This was a mistake. The Bigfoot was no more than
fifty feet off the trail. He is in total stealth mode. I have debated if the algorithm
of the digital camera turned him green or he was in stealth mode. I am now
convinced he was in stealth mode. He was green because that is the color of the
vegetation around his body.
The
above composites show the Bigfoot in “Stealth Mode”. Note that his face is green
and matches the foliage around him. The insert photograph on the left has been
converted to black and white. This allows you to see the facial detail.
Conclusions:
The
theory I have proposed could be categorized as “Science Fiction”. Scientists
have only begun to investigate acoustics and how it affects us and the world
around us. The science of acoustics is just now in its infancy. Early
experiments are showing that sound waves can do amazing things to include
levitating objects, boiling water, crumble solid rock, and have numerous
physical and physiological effects on humans.
Is
the use of acoustics a skill the Bigfoot has mastered? Do they use it on a regular
basis to communicate and protect themselves? Is this skill taught to their
young and passed on from generation to generation?
The
theory I have proposed could be just one possible answer to these questions. I
have only provided anecdotal evidence at best. It will take field time,
extensive video documentation, and some help from sympathetic experts in the
acoustics field to gather the necessary evidence to prove or disprove my
theory. I do however think it is plausible based on my observations and
research. It is a good starting point to build on.
Video of a Bigfoot in "Stealth Mode"
Here is an interesting narrative about anomalies seen on the Moon in relation to others who may have a technology to obfuscate what our senses can detect.
ReplyDelete"Consider this. Even at our lesser level of technology, we are already developing invisibility that bends light visually hiding objects and that is just what is being publicly admitted to. We also know that black hole mechanisms suck in everything including light, energy, and mass not allowing it to escape. It is not unreasonable to extrapolate that it is entirely possible that someone's else's higher level of technology may have harnessed to some degree one or the other or both of these principles to their benefit.
Why then would it be such a shock to logically contemplate that someone on the Moon with very advanced technology may have the capability to hide their structures on the near side from our relatively crude forms of visual viewing? Why would it be so hard to contemplate that they may have developed a technology that absorbs light and not allowing it to pass in a very efficient conversion to solar energy process supporting their civilization? Once the basic concept of such technology is grasped, the next step is to consider that such technology could easily impact the issue of shadows for artificial objects on the Moon.
As a race, we are beginning to now understand that there is much that exists that goes well beyond what we consider our primary senses. Remember, all of us know that just because we can't visually see the wind, it is most certainly there and we ignore its existence and force at our peril. The same for magnetism and gravity. I suspect no one here reading this is stupid enough to want to put gravity's presence to the test by personally jumping out of an airplane without a safety devise like a parachute."
http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2008/153/moon-tower-shadows.htm
Scott,
ReplyDeleteWhile it's obvious your passion and belief in what you've filmed here is genuine, the image quality and resolution are too poor to be convincing. My opinion is that your images are of normal shadows created by the vegetation, and the camera's moving relationship to those shadows, are giving different colors and fluid shape, because of the change in perspective as you walk.
I really don't think you captured anything here at all. Can't comment on all your research, as I've not viewed it yet. Perhaps a camera that captures 1080HD would give better results?!
Cheers,
Greg
Of course I completely disagree, but I appreciate the thoughtful and respectful comments. It is refreshing!
DeleteThanks!
Scott
Scott,
DeleteUnderstand, I do respect what your doing; anybody that has put in the tenacity and time that you obviously have deserve credit. I just think you could do your research more justice, and better make your assertions and observations with a camera like a Canon 7D or 5DMk2, that have high quality resolution, for a very reasonable price. Think about it!
Regards,
Greg
Scott, I have to agree with you. I also would like to add that on some videos it is not only blurry, but at times you can see a black, blurry shape. I can see the features that you mention. I would like to ask you if when you see this blurry shapes (on video) do you also see a lot of faces in the mass? Big ones, small ones, and sometimes even huge ones. It's like a reflection that gets transferred to film some how. I believe we are able to see them because of the digital cameras that are being used. Just wanted to say that I see them too. Thanks for the dedication.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work Scott, I find it fascinating, I really enjoy your videos and analysis, you have a skill in seeing what others miss, I think we are only just beginning to scratch the surface of the life of these beings, keep on tracking
ReplyDeleteI haven't seen anything in any of my video that does what you are saying. And I have my own video and pictures of bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteI live here in Arizona, and the only thing that I have found on my video is that when the zoom is out too far, I always have to deal with the UV light that begins to distort the picture/video.
I now rarely step into any digital zoom. I try my best to keep my cameras in only optical zoom. But it always gets the best of me, and so I dip into digital Z every now and then.
And when I do dip into digital zoom, I end up having to work harder when trying to pick things out.
Now, I'm not knocking your work because just from a few facial features that you show in some of your still captures and frame captures, that you're dealing with bigfoot.
The big bulbous nose is the main feature that stands out.
I don't like mentioning that feature because you can call out hoaxers when they try and pass a fake photo or video.
That feature is barely known.
But, it's all about the quality. But, "quality" costs money.
Not many researchers can shell out 1500.00 on a camera. Go Pros are useless and anything under 500 are as well.
But try and stay away from digital zoom.
I've been at this religiously for 8 years now. And I do consider myself a professional when it comes to analyzing digital media.
I don't have the paperwork, but I can teach a pro a thing or two.
Possibly 1000s of things, really.
One other things that makes all of this hard is something that is hard to get around. Green leaves.
They are a menace!
They're the shaoe of an eye cavity and eye.
Their color, green, is the best and brightest color that the human eye can pick up. This is why night vision are in green.
And, old dull leaves drop, giving way to bright new fresh leaves that reflect light really good! Also, the shape of leaves tend to bounce around the light that ends up on the camera's imaging chip. And at just 10 feet away, you have a green splash if the sun in involved even in the slightest.
99.9% of people don't understand any of this.
But this is one of the reasons why nost bigfoot videos and pictures end up playing havoc with what your camera produces.
Take a picture of a tree with green leaves. Just how much actual green do you see and how much white sunlight do you see being reflected back into the camera?
Quite a bit.
Hope this helps.
I never involve anything like dimensions and cloaking and things of that nature.
I involve what I can investigate.
The rest is hocus pocus.